TIMELINE of ALL Records

Toggle to View or Hide Record Summaries



2026

2025

  • Federal
    18 December 2025

    On December 18, 2025, Jose DeCastro filed a Federal lawsuit in California, this time against the City of Duncan, Oklahoma, and various public officials. It appears that Mr. DeCastro filed this Federal civil rights lawsuit in an attempt to halt a lower court's criminal case against him by including an Emergency Motion asking the Federal court to "quash" a warrant for his arrest issued in theState of Oklahoma v. DeCastrocase, but his Motion was DENIED.

  • Oklahoma
    10 December 2025

    Best Viewed in Landscape Mode
    Or Scroll The Table Below

    Charge Description Statute Level Disposition
    Count 1 LOITER IN / INJURE / MOLEST MOTOR VEHICLE / JOY RIDE 21 O.S. § 1787 Misdemeanor Trial Set For Feb 26, 2027
    Count 2 LOITER IN / INJURE / MOLEST MOTOR VEHICLE / JOY RIDE 21 O.S. § 1787 Misdemeanor
    Count 2 LOITER IN / INJURE / MOLEST MOTOR VEHICLE / JOY RIDE 21 O.S. § 1787 Misdemeanor
  • Federal
    21 November 2025

    The BWC video shows the entire length of the traffic stop, from pulling over until the officer left the scene, lasted a total of 17-18 minutes. In his complaint, Mr. DeCastro claims he was in handcuffs for "approximatly 20 to 30 minutes or longer." [Complaint Paragraph #31].

    On November 21, 2025, Jose DeCastro filed another Federal lawsuit in Nevada, this time against the Nevada Highway Patrol officers who conducted a traffic stop on November 22, 2023 inState of Nevada (NHP) v. DeCastro.

  • Federal
    05 August 2025

    On August 5, 2025, Jose DeCastro filed another Federal lawsuit, this time in the Northern District of California, against another YouTube contect creator with the channel called 'Irish Demon' who he names as John Brendan O'Dea. This time, electing not to file Pro Se, the suit was file by Randall S. Newman, who is listed as the Attorney for Plaintiff. This suit alleges a number of violations of various Federal Acts, California Penal code, and Copyright, to name a few. The defendant is this case is not a citizen of the United States but is, according to the suit, a resident of Ireland.

  • Federal
    03 June 2025

    On June 3, 2025, Jose DeCastro filed another Federal lawsuit, this time returning to Massachusetts District Court. In this case he filed defamation claims against Dale Hiller, who runs the YouTube channel 'LackLuster' that tends to focus on videos made by people who are commonly referred to as 'First Amendment Auditors.' The coverage on LackLuster's channel, while similar to that covered on Jose DeCastro's DeleteLawz YouTube channel, has a subscriber base that was somewhere around 3 times the size of DeCastro's at the time of the incidents that DeCastro is suing over.

    On September 25, Judge Burroughs dismissed DeCastro's Complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Being Pro Se, in docket # [35], DeCastro was given 21 days to file a 2nd Amended Complaint.

  • Federal
    21 May 2025

    On September 28, 2026, the case against Clark County and Deputy DA Agnes Botelho were dismissed. Case against the others is still pending.

    On May 21, 2025, Jose DeCastro filed another civil suit in Nevada in retaliation for his arrest and conviction in State of Nevada v. Jose DeCastro, which was later overturned on appeal. This time attempting to use a Monell claim to pierce judicial and qualified immunity of the Judge who sentenced him, the Judge who refused to release him on bail pending his appeal (even though she eventually reverse his conviction), the prosecuting attorney, the LVMPD officer who testified against him, a bailiff, and others. His lawsuit is claiming damages starting at 29 million dollars ranging to a high of 50 million.

2024

2023

2022

2021

  • California
    23 September 2021

    According to court documents, on September 23, 2021, DANA B CHAVEZ filed a request for a Civil Harassment Restraining Order against JOSE MARIA DECASTRO. The request contained allegations that DeCastro had been 'squatting' in the building, that he threatened Chavez's life, that he accused Chavez of taking his keys, and Chavez stated that they were in fear of physical injury. Based on the statements in the complaint, a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) was issued that was to be in effect until a hearing scheduled for October 19th.

2020

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2012

2010

2008

2007

2005

2004

2002

  • California
    22 September 2002

    Best Viewed in Landscape Mode
    Or Scroll The Table Below

    Charge Description Statute Level Disposition
    1 POS/PUR F/SALE NARC/C/CUB * HSC §11351 Felony Deferred Entry of Judgment (DEJ)
    Dismissed Upon Successful Completion of the Program

    *Approx Date. Charges also read at other court hearings

    People v. DeCastro (BA237023)is compiled from background searches, other court records, and Mr. DeCastro's own YouTube admissions, along with a recording of the charges being read into the record by a Judge in a Masschusett's HRO Hearing.

1998

1995

1994

1993

1992

1990



The Public Documents

The documents on this site can be found in various locations on the Internet, or in court records. They have been released under FOIA by government organizations, or by public entities, corporations and individuals. They are public records. ThePublicDocuments.com obtains these files from Internet sites, or directly from the parties listed above. If information appears to be inaccurate or incomplete, contact the person, organization, agency, or corporation responsible for originally releasing the information to the public. New, updated, corrected, or modified documents will be posted here as soon as we receive a copy.


Identity Resolution

We manually connect multiple key data points - like names, birthdates, emails, phone numbers and more - in the documents we find on social media and court websites. The more matching data points, the more confidence we have that the posted file, image, or document belongs to Jose Maria "Chille" DeCastro, aka DeleteLawZ. We look for multiple matches before publishing a record. If you feel that we have incorrectly included a record, please use the Contact Us form on this website and we will review the data points to ensure the accuracy of the information.