State of WASHINGTON

Record Summary

Ozaukee County vs. Jose Maria Decastro (2023TR002643)

Charge Description Statute Disposition
1 No Tail Lamp/Defective Tail Lamp-Night 347.13(1) Guilty. No Contest Plea. $162.70 Fine

On October 18, 2023, after what could be called an unsuccessful trip to Michigan to disrupt a government meeting, Mr. DeCastro was pulled over by police in Wisconsin in his rental car in the early morning hours. He recorded part of his interaction with the officer and, true-to-form, appeared agressive and forceful when communicating with the officer. While he preaches to his YouTube followers to always remain silent and not interact with the police, Mr. DeCastro's video appears to show him doing otherwise. While issuing a citation is at the officer's discresion, and often an equipment violation on a rental car may simply generate a warning, the officer in this case elected to issue Mr. DeCastro a citation.

On November 7, 2023, Jose DeCastro did not attend court but appears to have entered a 'No Contest' plea. At that time a default judgement of GUILTY was entered and a fine of $162.70 was issued. The fine was paid prior to the due date.

There has been speculation as to who paid the fine, Mr. DeCastro or the rental car company. In Mr. DeCastro's video he shows the lights operating at some point during the stop. If the light were off prior and on later, it suggests the issue may have been an operator error. As a rental car company would probably cover defective equipment, Mr. DeCastro's own video suggests that he would have been responsible for payment and not the rental car company.

Case Related Videos

Video Provided by YouTube API
VisitFraudie International OperationsYouTube Channel
Docket # / Document List
Click the Blue Button to Open, View, and Download
If only grey boxes appear below, refresh your browser to reload PDF files

Our Mission

To present the facts about a controversial social media personality and self-proclaimed 'constitutional legal scholar' who may be misinforming and harming the public with commentary that can be viewed as anti-law enforcement, anti-free speech. His reaction to negative or opposing viewpoints often leads to charges of harassment or other legal action, the exposing of critics personal information, and copyright strikes on videos used under the Fair Use doctrine. With the vast number of document locations, our goal is to become a single resource for viewing all the publicly available material.

The Documents

All documents on this site can be found in various locations on the Internet. They have been released under FOIA by government organizations, or by public entities, corporations and individuals. They are public records. ThePublicDocuments.com obtains these files from Internet sites, or directly from the parties listed above. If information appears to be inaccurate or incomplete, contact the person, organization, agency, or corporation responsible for originally releasing the information to the public. New, updated, corrected, or modified documents will be posted here as soon as we receive a copy.

Gavel   = Active Case