Traffic Citation

Full List by Date Descending

State of Nevada (NHP) v. DeCastro

On November 22, 2023, Jose Maria DeCastro was issued a citation by the Nevada Highway Patrol while driving on the Las Vegas Freeway ( IR 15 ) at mile marker 8. While Mr. DeCastro did not release his own version of the traffic stop as he so often does, Body Worn Camera footage has been obtained and is very informative.

At the request of Jose DeCastro, the original hearing to contest his November 22, 2023, citation for Failure to Obey a Traffic Control Device was postponed and a new hearing date was set for Tuesday, April 23, 2024.

On April 23, 2024, the hearing was held and, due to his incarceration in the Clark County Detention Center as a result of a guilty verdict in Nevada v. DeCastro (23-CR-013015), Jose DeCastro was not in attendance. The Defendant was found to have commited the infraction, his $415 penalty stands and was paid from the cash bond that Mr. DeCastro was required to post to contest the citation.

Ozaukee County vs. Jose Maria Decastro (2023TR002643)

Charge Description Statute Disposition
1 No Tail Lamp/Defective Tail Lamp-Night 347.13(1) Guilty. No Contest Plea. $162.70 Fine

On October 18, 2023, after what could be called an unsuccessful trip to Michigan to disrupt a government meeting, Mr. DeCastro was pulled over by police in Wisconsin in his rental car in the early morning hours. He recorded part of his interaction with the officer and, true-to-form, appeared agressive and forceful when communicating with the officer. While he preaches to his YouTube followers to always remain silent and not interact with the police, Mr. DeCastro's video appears to show him doing otherwise. While issuing a citation is at the officer's discresion, and often an equipment violation on a rental car may simply generate a warning, the officer in this case elected to issue Mr. DeCastro a citation.

On November 7, 2023, Jose DeCastro did not attend court but appears to have entered a 'No Contest' plea. At that time a default judgement of GUILTY was entered and a fine of $162.70 was issued. The fine was paid prior to the due date.

There has been speculation as to who paid the fine, Mr. DeCastro or the rental car company. In Mr. DeCastro's video he shows the lights operating at some point during the stop. If the light were off prior and on later, it suggests the issue may have been an operator error. As a rental car company would probably cover defective equipment, Mr. DeCastro's own video suggests that he would have been responsible for payment and not the rental car company.

People v. Jose Maria DeCastro (23IN-022641)

On March 3, 2023, Mr. DeCastro had a live stream on his YouTube channel and recorded his interaction with officers from the Apple Valley Unified School District Police Department. According to statements made by the officers and Mr. DeCastro in the video, officers saw Mr. DeCastro driving while holding his cell phone in violation of California statutes. Mr. DeCastro's video shows, and he admits in the video, that he was recording the officers while the vehicle was in motion. Mr. DeCastro was issued a citation which he captured in his video and a screenshot is displayed below.

On May 6, 2023, Mr. DeCastro prepaid a fine and requested a 'Trial By Declaration.' In a trial by declaration, Mr. DeCastro was able to send in a written statement, along with any evidence he had, to the court. The officer who wrote the ticket then sent in their own written statement. A judge reviewed both and, on June 28, 2023, the Judge ruled Mr. DeCastro NOT GUILTY. After that, his prepaid fine was refunded.

Best Viewed in Landscape Mode
Or Scroll The Table Below

  Charge / Description Statute Level Disposition
1 Prohibited driving of motor vehicle while using wireless telephone VC23123.5(a) Infraction Not Guilty

People v. Jose Maria DeCastro

On August 8, 2022, while possibly conducting one of his 'audits' of police during traffic stops, Jose Maria DeCastro was issued a citation for stopping, parking, or leaving his vehicle on a freeway. On November 16th, 2022, the record shows he was found Guilty in Absentia indicating a Failure to Appear.

People v. Jose Maria DeCastro (ELI070966)

On July 11, 2022, Jose Maria DeCastro was issued a citation for exceeding the maximum posted speed of 70 MPH. On September 12, 2022, the record shows a trial was held in Absentia, indicating a Failure to Appear. On October 4, 2022, the record shows the case was ruled as a Conviction: Bail Forfeiture.

State of Arizona v. DeCastro

On December 19, 2021, Jose Maria DeCastro was cited with 2 moving violations. On or about June 9, 2022, a Judge found him GUILTY of both. Based on the records available at the time of this writing, it appears Mr. DeCastro notified the court that he intends to appeal and, on May 5, 2022, a Motion to extend the time to appeal was extended.

People v. Jose Maria DeCastro (20IN-059018)

A May 1, 2023, notation showed up on the docket for this citation after Mr. DeCastro received a citation in 2023, (see People v. DeCastro 23IN-022641) and he called to check on the status of this citation. After he paid the 2023 citation it was noted that this hearing was then flagged as cancelled/vacated.

On June 9, 2020, Mr. DeCastro received a citation for traveling in excess of 100 MPH (Citation # KD45279). When he failed to appear on court dates in October and November of 2021, a second charge for Failure to Appear was added on November 13th, 2021. After that, Mr. DeCastro then failed to appear for a 3rd time in December of that year.

Charge Description Statute Level Disposition
001: 06/09/2020 Speed Limit - Over 100 MPH VC 22348(B)-1 Infraction Pending/Collections ?
002: 11/13/2021 Failure to Appear (DMV Hold) VC 22348(B)-1 Infraction Pending/Collections ?

City of Henderson v. DeCastro

On June 19, 2014, Jose Maria DeCastro was charged with Failure to Obey Traffic Control Devices and Failure to Possess Drivers License or Surrender License Upon Demand. Based upon what can be viewed on the City of Henderson's website, it appears Mr. DeCastro failed to appear and the docket shows a Failure To Appear (FTA) Bench Warrant being issued in July. A similar notation also appears with a September 2, 2014, date. In October of 2014 the case was referred to a collection agency. In September of 2021 the City of Henderson appears to have closed the case and purged the warrant.

People v. Jose Maria DeCastro

On October May 23, 2012, Mr. DeCastro received a citation for crossing the double lines (Citation # 52295PR). With what appears to be a typical response to many of his court cases, Mr. DeCastro also had a charge of Failure To Appear added when he failed to appear for a court date.

Charge Description Statute Level Disposition
1: 05/23/2012 Cross Double Lines VC 1655.8(A) Infraction Guilty
2: 08/17/2012 Failure To Appear (DMV Hold) VC 140508(A) Infraction Guilty

People v. Jose Maria DeCastro (36095HHJD)

On October 7, 2010, Mr. DeCastro received a citation for what appears to be having no registration (Citation # 36095HH). He plead Guilty and was fined.

Charge Description Statute Level Disposition
1 Registration Required VC 4000(A)-I Infraction Guilty

State of Nevada v. DeCastro

Based on the record found, it appears that on August 23, 2008, Jose Maria DeCastro was issued two citations. One for speeding and the other for failure to produce his driver's license when the officer asked for it. He plead 'Not Guilty' to the speeding citation, but the record shows he paid a fine of $190 which would indicate he was found or plead guilty. The second charge was dismissed, which is common if the person charged produces their license when appearing before the court.

State of Oregon v. DeCastro (9560193-D)

On May 4, 1995, Jose Maria DeCastro was charged with several motor vehicle infractions. Exceed Maximum Speed, Opr Vehcile/Vio Restrictions, and Driving Uninsured. The charges were all listed as DISMISSED on June 1, 1995.

The 'Opr Vehicle/Vio Restrictions' statute appears to be 'Driving wo License' which give qualifies this record for inclusion in the 'Criminal Record ?' category.

State of Alaska vs. Decastro, Jose

On August 24, 1993, Jose Maria DeCastro was charged Driving while License Canceled, Suspended, Revoked, or in Violation of a Limitation which was later amended to No Valid Operators License. At one point a Warrant was issued for Failure To Appear which was later recalled. Plea of No Contest entered. This fits the common definition of a Criminal Traffic Violation and has been tagged as such in our system.

State of Alaska vs. DeCastro

On April 20, 1993, Jose Maria DeCastro was charged with Driving vehicle when registration suspended or revoked or permit expired.

City of Soldotna vs. DeCastro

On April 2, 1993, Jose Maria DeCastro was charged with Failure to Stop at a Stop Sign.

City of Soldotna vs. DeCastro

On March 23, 1993, Jose Maria DeCastro was charged with 13AAC02.275(a): Basic Speed: Reasonable & Prudent For Road Conditions.

Our Mission

To present the facts about a controversial social media personality and self-proclaimed 'constitutional legal scholar' who may be misinforming and harming the public with commentary that can be viewed as anti-law enforcement, anti-free speech. His reaction to negative or opposing viewpoints often leads to charges of harassment or other legal action, the exposing of critics personal information, and copyright strikes on videos used under the Fair Use doctrine. With the vast number of document locations, our goal is to become a single resource for viewing all the publicly available material.

The Documents

All documents on this site can be found in various locations on the Internet. They have been released under FOIA by government organizations, or by public entities, corporations and individuals. They are public records. ThePublicDocuments.com obtains these files from Internet sites, or directly from the parties listed above. If information appears to be inaccurate or incomplete, contact the person, organization, agency, or corporation responsible for originally releasing the information to the public. New, updated, corrected, or modified documents will be posted here as soon as we receive a copy.

Gavel   = Active Case