Small Claims

Full List by Date Descending

Laurence Wainer c/o Blow and Drive Interlock Corp v Ethics SCS Inc (DeCastro)

On January 3, 2018, Laurence Wainer c/o Blow and Drive Interlock Corp initiated a Small Claims lawsuit again Ethics SCS Inc, a corporation created by Jose Maria 'Chille' DeCastro. Docmentation in this case lists Jose DeCasatro as Chille DeCastro, Ethics SCS Inc and Coded Friends. A trial date of 8/23/2018 was set.

The claim was Ethics SCS Inc (Chille) owed Laurence Wainer $4,999 for a video they commissioned Ethics SCS Inc to do that was never delivered. At the time of the court filing, they claim they had paid Mr. DeCastro $6,000 for the video and had only been refunded $1,000. (See 4/26/18 Plaintiff's Claim and ORDER to Go to Small Claims Court).

On August 23, 2018, after a Non-Jury Trial, the Court ruled in favor of the Paintiff and Jose DeCastro was ordered to pay $3,999 + $245 in Court costs for a total of $4,244. Mr. DeCastro appealed the decision on October 16, 2018, and on November 19 a Trial De Novo resulted in the decision being upheld, with the only change apparently a reduction in cost from $245 to $185 for a total of $4,184.

Interesting Hubilu Connection
On the Proof of Service by Substituted Service, page 2, filed on May 30th, a quote attributed to David Behrend, CEO of Hubilu, states that Mr. DeCastro "...only work(s) here one day a month."

A very unusual work schedule for the Vice President of a Marketing Department.

Ethics SCS Inc v. Moradi, Ali

On September 4, 2015, Ethics SS Inc (Jose DeCastro's company) initiated a Small Claims action against Ali Moradi DBA Jadou Web Design. On November 16, 2015, the case was ruled against Ali Moradi after, it appears Ali Moradi failed to appear. A judgement issued against Ali Moradi for $1500 plus costs of $50 for a total of $1550..

Our Mission

To present the facts about a controversial social media personality and self-proclaimed 'constitutional legal scholar' who may be misinforming and harming the public with commentary that can be viewed as anti-law enforcement, anti-free speech. His reaction to negative or opposing viewpoints often leads to charges of harassment or other legal action, the exposing of critics personal information, and copyright strikes on videos used under the Fair Use doctrine. With the vast number of document locations, our goal is to become a single resource for viewing all the publicly available material.

The Documents

All documents on this site can be found in various locations on the Internet. They have been released under FOIA by government organizations, or by public entities, corporations and individuals. They are public records. ThePublicDocuments.com obtains these files from Internet sites, or directly from the parties listed above. If information appears to be inaccurate or incomplete, contact the person, organization, agency, or corporation responsible for originally releasing the information to the public. New, updated, corrected, or modified documents will be posted here as soon as we receive a copy.

Gavel   = Active Case