DENIED

Full List by Date Descending

DeCastro v. Las Vegas Metro PD (Appeal to the 9th Circuit)

On August 14th, 2023, Jose DeCastro filed an appeal with the 9th Circuit when the Judge in his Civil lawsuit ruled against his montion to stay the Criminal Case against him in Vegas.

See related cases DeCastro v. Las Vegas Metro PD and Nevada v. DeCastro (23-CR-013015).

On November 21, 2023, the 9th Circuit ruled that the "district court Judge did not abuse his discretion in denying DeCastro's motion for reconsideration", affirming the Judge and denying DeCastro's appeal.

.

DeCastro v. Peter/Abrams (HRO Attempt 2)

  • Source: Various Recordings of the Events and comments by both Plaintiff and Defendant.

Around September 23, 2022, Jose Maria DeCastro attempted for the 2nd time to obtain a Harassment Protection Order against Kate Peter using the same evidence that was unsuccessful in the 1st attempt. As with the 1st attempt, a temporary order was denied and when a hearing was held in Massachusetts, the Court DENIED Mr. DeCastro's request for a long term protection order.

This case is documented in the Massachusetts court system and in numerous YouTube videos that are still online. More Information about this and the other MA HRO case will be included on our website when we can confirm the dates and courthouses.

DeCastro v. Peter/Abrams (HRO Attempt 1)

  • Source: Various Recordings of the Events and comments by both Plaintiff and Defendant.

Near the beginning of June, 2022, Jose Maria DeCastro attempted to obtain a Harassment Protection Order against Kate Peter. A temporary order was denied and when a hearing was held in a Massachusetts on June 10th, 2022, the Court DENIED Mr. DeCastro's request for a long term protection order.

Koenig, Francis v DeCastro, Jose

Civil Harassment Prevention (General Jurisdiction) Temporary RO granted. Denied - RO- After Evidence by both

Our Mission

To present the facts about a controversial social media personality and self-proclaimed 'constitutional legal scholar' who may be misinforming and harming the public with commentary that can be viewed as anti-law enforcement, anti-free speech. His reaction to negative or opposing viewpoints often leads to charges of harassment or other legal action, the exposing of critics personal information, and copyright strikes on videos used under the Fair Use doctrine. With the vast number of document locations, our goal is to become a single resource for viewing all the publicly available material.

The Documents

All documents on this site can be found in various locations on the Internet. They have been released under FOIA by government organizations, or by public entities, corporations and individuals. They are public records. ThePublicDocuments.com obtains these files from Internet sites, or directly from the parties listed above. If information appears to be inaccurate or incomplete, contact the person, organization, agency, or corporation responsible for originally releasing the information to the public. New, updated, corrected, or modified documents will be posted here as soon as we receive a copy.

Gavel   = Active Case